Posted on March 3, 2012 by crcleaks
Posted on March 3, 2012 by crcleaks
Posted on February 29, 2012 by crcleaks
Posted on February 23, 2012 by crcleaks
Tim Leavitt’s Feb. 19 letter, “Anti-CRC letter factually incorrect,” is an excellent example of the arrogance and propaganda that surrounds the Columbia River Crossing project. He makes it abundantly clear that, in his opinion, his version of any information is “factual,” that anything else is incorrect, and communicating it may serve as “an injustice to better informing our public.” His attitude and letter serve to belittle previous letter writer John Burke and intimidate The Columbian and others who may want to express their views.
READ MORE: http://www.columbian.com/news/2012/feb/24/letter-crc-dissension-discounted/
Posted on February 11, 2012 by crcleaks
I have one question for the planners about their proposal for light rail on the Columbia River Crossing project. Where is it written that an Oregon congressman, as well as a lame-duck mayor of Portland, can dictate to the people of Clark County as to what we will have or not have? This is what Congressman Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., and Mayor Sam Adams are attempting to do.
READ MORE: http://www.columbian.com/news/2012/feb/12/letter-reject-light-rail/
Posted on February 11, 2012 by crcleaks
It’s good to see The Columbian expose the Columbia River Crossing’s shortcomings; maybe this boondoggle of replacing the Interstate 5 bridge will be stopped. I remember back in the 1970s, the pitch for creating I-205 was to relieve some of the traffic from urban Vancouver and Portland. Now they want to do the reverse. What has changed? Oh yes, to justify their pet project and build a monument unto themselves. A third bridge downstream would serve a better need.
READ MORE: http://www.columbian.com/news/2012/feb/10/letter-new-i-5-bridge-not-needed/
Posted on January 30, 2012 by crcleaks
Posted on January 17, 2012 by crcleaks
Posted on January 15, 2012 by crcleaks
As serious questions continue to follow the Columbia River Crossing, project leaders continue to push ahead, defending their progress against high-profile critics. Among the most vocal has been bridge architect Kevin Peterson. Since 2010, the Friday Harbor resident has advocated for an upstream alignment of the new bridge, using a “collector-distributor” design to ease the strain of several interchanges and ramps crammed into a small stretch. Peterson’s design would set those exits apart on a separate lower deck. Pass-through freeway traffic would flow above unaffected, he said.
READ MORE: http://www.columbian.com/news/2012/jan/14/criticism-of-bridge-design-hasnt-let-up/
Posted on December 27, 2011 by crcleaks
I am baffled that Mayor Tim Leavitt and County Commissioner Steve Stuart would attack Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Camas, for wanting to hold a vote on the Columbia River Crossing project. They asked her to “take a position,” but when she did, they skewered her. They really want her to join the crowd of government agencies who favor the big light rail/CRC project.
READ MORE: http://www.columbian.com/news/2011/dec/26/letter-herrera-beutlers-position-clear/
Posted on December 20, 2011 by crcleaks
As this region considers undertaking a $3.5 billion Columbia River Crossing project, I want to thank Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Camas, for standing up for the people she represents and not bending to the political or bureaucratic pressure (unlike some elected officials who have done so).
READ MORE: http://www.columbian.com/news/2011/dec/19/letter-people-want-vote-light-rail/
Posted on December 15, 2011 by crcleaks
David Evans & Associates — the private company that holds the largest contract with the Columbia River Crossing — has dropped a lawsuit against a Vancouver company investigating the project’s spending. The move came after the Acuity Group, a Vancouver-based accounting firm that businessman and staunch CRC opponent David Madore hired to comb through the project’s finances, withdrew a public records request for the firm’s audited financial statements.
READ MORE: http://www.columbian.com/news/2011/dec/14/crossing-request-lawsuit-dropped/